Jump to content

TURTLE BEACH – ELITE ATLAS AERO Review

If you are looking for a wireless headset that is feature rich, low priced and actually sounds like headsets worth 2x as much, check out the Turtle Beach Elite Atlas Aero Wireless.
Read now

SILICON POWER P34A60GB M.2 Review

QUIRKY YET COMPLIMENTARY ADDITION TO SP’S LINE-UP
Read now

Crucial X8 Portable SSD Review

Read now
The Crucial X8 Portable SSD series may not be a perfect fit for everyone and every scenario, but it does come closer than nearly any other device in recent memory.

Arctic Freezer 34 eSports DUO Review

Read now
Arctic really knows how to do value right. Usually value means trading off the upfront cost for mediocrity in some other areas (aesthetics, ease of use, noise, etc.).

INWIN A1 PLUS Review

Read now
Though the A1 Plus is not perfect it is damn close. InWin has really brought their A game to the A1 Series of cases. Even if you are not a RGB fan the ARGB is truly beautiful and simple to setup and use.
News Ticker
  • Welcome to the New RHR Forums
  • RHR Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Soullessone21

SILICON POWER P34A60GB M.2 REVIEW

Recommended Posts

As time marches on, more and more mainstream buyers are starting to opt for multiple Solid-State Drive based storage solutions instead of the more ‘classic’ SSD+HDD configuration. This in turn has created a demand for SSD’s that are fast enough, large enough, and above all else inexpensive enough to serve as secondary storage devices. For those with a need for speed these secondary storage orientated devices are NVMe and not SATA based. NVMe options may typically cost noticeably more, but the performance benefits are tangible to say the least. We say ‘typically’ as recently Silicon Power became aware of this emerging market and created a newer, more value oriented, addition to their M.2 NVMe line – the P34A60 series. Today we will be reviewing the $55 512GB capacity option.

Silicon Power P34A60GB M.2 Review

As the name suggests this new A60 series is not intended to replace the slightly more expensive A80 series. Instead it is meant to compliment that series and create a more cohesive line up for Silicon Power. One where they have you covered regardless of your specific needs – be they price, small file performance, large file performance, or even just capacity. This complimentary philosophy is why the A60 series does not make use of PHISON controller, nor Toshiba BiCS 3 NAND… nor even onboard RAM cache.

Silicon Power P34A60 intro - Silicon Power P34A60GB M.2 Review

Instead these higher performance components have been swapped out for more budget friendly options. Make no mistake the A60 series still offers performance well in excess of what SATA based drives can do. These components are still very good… they just do not cost as much to use as their P34A80 series counterparts. This is why this new series is within grasping distance of the mythical 10 cents per Gigabyte milestone.

To be a bit more precise the NAND is still TLC 3D NAND, it just is IMFT 3D TLC NAND not BiCS3 TLC NAND. This NAND is a touch older and thus a touch less expensive, but it is not lower performance QLC (4-bit) NAND like its main competition the Crucial P1 series makes used of. On the NVMe controller side of the equation, the Phison E12 has been substituted for a Silicon Motion SM2263XT controller. As we will go over in this review, this choice of a DRAM-less controller has many side-effects. Some of them good, some of them… not so good. The end result though is certainly interesting, and certainly ‘outside the box thinking’ for late 2019.

Read Full Review

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the review. What’s your overall take at the end of the day vs other cheap nvme (P1, 660p, others?)?

Would love to see SX8200 pro added to your charts at some point. Other reviews seem somewhat mixed in it being either amazing, or flawed and only performing well when empty/benchmarks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like adding a row to the charts for cache yes/no would be good info, as that seems to be a huge factor for differentiating these lower cost drives. Typically I'd assume a buyer of this kind of drive is going to have a single drive and might run into the speed concerns without the cache.

 

Nonetheless looks like a decent option for a second game drive like GaK said. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a good idea LP. The next time I come across an oddball drive I will add it in. 🙂

As for my hot take on the 60... for game drive whichever is cheapest. For data drive... same. For more mulit-role... get a P1 or 660P or any other decent drive with onboard cache. The 60 really is meant for secondary storage duties. NOW with that said, if it was the 60 or a SATA drive... get the 60. It will be faster than sata as an OS drive as long as you have 16GB or more of RAM.

YMMV

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...