Jump to content
News Ticker
  • Join us in our daily conversations to keep up with giveaways and reviews
  • RHR Forums

CRUCIAL MX500 1TB M.2: SMALL IN SIZE, BUT BIG IN VALUE


Recommended Posts

Not that long ago we took a long hard look at the MX500 Solid State Drive series and walked away very impressed with Crucial was able to accomplish in a single generation. The MX500s combination of price, performance, and capacity really is as modern Siren Song for knowledgeable consumers looking for a SATA/AHCI based storage solution. At that time there was indeed many capacity options available but they all had one thing in common: the form-factor. Knowing that not every system simply do not have room for the typical SATA 2.5 7.5/9mm form-factor Crucial has also released this series in the M.2 2280 form-factor. Today we are going to take a long hard look at the Crucial MX500 1TB M.2 form-factored version to see if it lives up to the proud tradition of previous versions.

alt text

A very good argument could be made that M.2 is indeed much, much better than the older 2.5-inch form-factor as it does not require a free hard drive bay, does not impeded air flow from the PC cases front fan(s) (which usually do double duty as active cooling for the SSD/HDD in the drive bay), and most importantly of all does not clutter up a system with ugly SATA data and power cables. On the flip side though is the fact that it is smaller and the solid-state drive itself is not housed inside a metal chassis. This means less cooling potential (i.e. no heatsink for the NAND and controller) and thus potentially less sustained performance.

Usually this only impacts NVMe based M.2 solid state drives (and why many opt for Add In Card form-factor models when available) as their controllers are more power hungry and stress the NAND a lot more, but it can cause confusion for buyers interested in shiny new MX500 drive when they see both the 2.5-inch and M.2 options and see that both are priced very, very similarly to each other.

alt text

This is how this review came about as we want to conclusively show one way or the other if the form-factor really matters for the MX500 series in real-world conditions. If it does make a difference we will also go over the ways in which we mitigate heat related problems with M.2 drives. As well we will make our recommendations on which version is best for what scenarios. Hopefully with all this data you will be able to make an informed decision and pick the right model for your particulars build needs; or at the very least be able to make the form-factor that is available work for you to the best of its abilities. In likelihood this is going to be a non-issue but reducing confusion and providing you our loyal readers with all the information possible really is the driving force behind why we do reviews in the first place. So we hope you enjoy this article and walk away with more knowledge than you had before.

Full Review HereLike and ShareLike and Retweet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, its hard to beat the MX500 on bang for your buck.... and lets face it with SATA the real world difference between the MX500 and ANY higher priced SATA solid state drive is going to be virtually unnoticeable. The only real competition for it is the BX series. The new BX500 is rather interesting... thats all Im going to say for the time being /whistle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@gak_45 said in CRUCIAL MX500 1TB M.2: SMALL IN SIZE, BUT BIG IN VALUE:

Yup, its hard to beat the MX500 on bang for your buck.... and lets face it with SATA the real world difference between the MX500 and ANY higher priced SATA solid state drive is going to be virtually unnoticeable. The only real competition for it is the BX series. The new BX500 is rather interesting... thats all Im going to say for the time being /whistle.

I have read mixed info on the bx500...curious on your take of it. The bx300 was always a solid recommend though (the last of cheap mlc?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant say one way or the other YET. Havent gotten it. Until I do... it is interesting and has me curious. Once I test it I will know if it is a good successor to the BX300 or not.... but that is one HIGH bar to clear. The BX300 was better than the MX300 for 70-80 percent of buyers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just cracked one open and looked up the NAND numbering.... and I can happily report the BX500 is NOT, repeat NOT QLC based. It uses TLC NAND. Here is the data sheet for the NAND: https://www.micron.com/parts/nand-flash/mass-storage/mt29f256g08eecbbj4-6

It is DRAM-less though. So win some / loose some. It is however shaping up to be a decent secondary storage option!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Newest Posts

    • Hello everyone, now I am choosing between several laptops, but maybe you can advise me something better my priorities: mostly just for home, for watching movies and YouTube, for some light games (a couple of times a month), and sometimes for work (mostly google drive, various marketing resources, nothing heavy) around 600 USD 15.6" or more Acer, Asus? Order on Amazon? Windows prefarable 256 SSD or more. I will leave links of those notebooks that I am thinking about now https://www.amazon.com/Acer-A515-44-R41B-Hexa-Core-Processor-Graphics/dp/B087N4ZRXV?ref_=Oct_s9_apbd_simh_hd_bw_b2N0e&pf_rd_r=61THRATEMWAKYQZB6J7M&pf_rd_p=121acd9e-769b-5530-ae68-5a92ebd704d6&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-10&pf_rd_t=BROWSE&pf_rd_i=565108 https://www.amazon.com/Acer-A515-55-56VK-i5-1035G1-Fingerprint-Keyboard/dp/B087RTV311/ref=sr_1_10?dchild=1&qid=1613042065&rnid=13896617011&s=computers-intl-ship&sr=1-10 THANKS!   Cali employee monitoring software
    • Hopefully, everyone can get this card before the bots do. Full unboxing of the new Nvidia 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio from MSI below:  
    • Rest assured that no matter if you choose a mainstream Core i5, a high-end Core i7, or the enthusiast Core i9 that you will be getting a very good to excellent processor. All three offer a lot of performance without all that much upfront cost. It just is those who want to get the best, most optimal, option for their needs should put more time, thought, and effort into their decision. So do your homework. Think about what you actually do with your system. Then come to your own conclusions. Not what anyone, including us, tell you what you should be buying. Doing otherwise may result in a rather major disservice to yourself and your next system.   Read the full review below: https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/intel-core-i7-10700k-core-i5-10600k-review/
    • In summary, if you are looking for a good deal, do not need it to be ‘the fastest’ PCIe 3.0 drive going, and do not plan on hammering it with more than 50% of the free capacity at one time, the Silicon Power UD70 2TB is a good option at a great price. Just understand the target demographics it was built for and the compromises required to hit its low asking price before you track one down.   Read the full review below:  https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/silicon-power-ud70-2tb-review/
    • In summary, if you are looking for a good deal, do not need it to be ‘the fastest’ PCIe 3.0 drive going, and do not plan on hammering it with more than 50% of the free capacity at one time, the Silicon Power UD70 2TB is a good option at a great price. Just understand the target demographics it was built for and the compromises required to hit its low asking price before you track one down.   Read the full review below:  https://www.realhardwarereviews.com/silicon-power-ud70-2tb-review/
×
×
  • Create New...